Ghada Ismail

Saudi Arabia's rise as a hub for institutional capital has become hard to ignore, and few are better placed to explain why than the people structuring the deals themselves. Behind the headlines about giga-projects and sovereign wealth lies a quieter shift in how founders raise money, how investors assess risk, and which sectors are actually ready for capital. We spoke with Sayed A., Chief Business Officer of Graystone Capital's Dubai office, who walked us through what's genuinely changed for founders and investors in the Kingdom, the missteps that still catch fundraisers off guard, the financing routes too often overlooked in favor of venture capital, and where the smart money is heading as the market matures toward 2030.

 1. Graystone Capital has identified Saudi Arabia as one of its strategic markets. What makes the Kingdom particularly attractive for institutional investors today? 

A few numbers tell the story better than any pitch deck could. According to UNCTAD's World Investment Report 2026, Saudi Arabia climbed to 13th place globally for FDI inflows in 2025, up from 17th the year before, with net inflows of $32.6 billion, a jump of roughly 53% year-on-year. That is not a one-off spike; it is the compounding effect of reforms that have been building for several years now. 

The most consequential of these, in our view, is the new Investment Law that came into force in February 2025, replacing legislation that had governed foreign investment since 2000. It puts local and foreign investors on genuinely equal footing, extends protections against expropriation, and has accelerated the shift toward 100% foreign ownership across a widening list of sectors. Combine that with a sovereign credit profile now rated in the A-category across Moody's, Fitch and S&P, a public investment pipeline north of $1 trillion tied to the giga-projects, and a domestic consumer market of over 36 million people with strong disposable income, and you have a market that offers both scale and increasingly predictable rules of engagement. For institutional capital, that combination of scale, reform, and macro stability is rare, and it's precisely why we've prioritized the Kingdom. 

2. What differentiates Saudi founders from entrepreneurs in other GCC markets when raising capital? 

Saudi founders today are raising in a market that has genuinely pulled ahead of its neighbors. MAGNiTT's FY2025 data shows Saudi Arabia captured $1.72 billion in venture funding across 257 deals, the highest figure and deal count ever recorded by a single country in the MENA region, and enough to make the Kingdom the top-ranked VC market regionally for the third consecutive year. That changes founder behavior. Where entrepreneurs elsewhere in the Gulf often have to court capital from Dubai, London or Riyadh simultaneously, Saudi founders increasingly have deep local pools to draw from first, sovereign-backed vehicles like SVC and Sanabil, family offices such as Olayan and Alturki, and homegrown institutional funds like STV and Raed. 

The other distinguishing factor is proximity to government-anchored demand. A Saudi founder building in logistics, healthtech, or industrial software isn't just pitching an addressable market; they are often pitching direct alignment with a named Vision 2030 program, a giga-project procurement pipeline, or a PIF portfolio company that could become a first customer. That gives Saudi founders a credibility shortcut in the room that founders in more mature, less state-directed ecosystems don't always have, though it also means investors here scrutinize a founder's actual government and enterprise relationships more closely than they might elsewhere. 

3. Many founders believe securing funding is simply about having a great idea. From your experience, what are the biggest reasons startups fail to raise capital? 

The idea is rarely the problem. In our experience arranging financing across the region, the founders who struggle almost always stumble on three things: unclear capital structure, weak financial discipline, and a mismatch between what they're asking for and what stage they're actually at. 

On capital structure, we regularly see founders who haven't thought through their cap table until an investor asks about it in the room, prior friends-and-family rounds with vague terms, undocumented related-party loans, or founder equity splits that don't survive due diligence. On financial discipline, even at seed and Series A stage, investors now expect management accounts that reconcile, not back-of-envelope spreadsheets; the bar has risen noticeably as the Saudi market has matured and institutional money has entered. And on stage mismatch, we still see founders pitching growth-stage valuations off pre-revenue traction, which immediately signals to a sophisticated investor that the founder doesn't yet understand how their own business will be underwritten. None of these are about the idea; they're about whether the business is investment-ready, which is a very different, and fixable, problem. 

4. What common valuation mistakes do founders make during fundraising? 

The most common mistake is anchoring a valuation to a regional headline round rather than to the founder's own unit economics. Saudi Arabia's 2025 VC market saw funding rise 145% year-on-year, and mega deals like Tabby and Ninja understandably get attention, but those are outliers, not benchmarks, and founders who price their own seed or Series A round off a mega-deal multiple usually find the market pushes back hard, or worse, get a term sheet loaded with structure (liquidation preferences, ratchets) that quietly claws back the headline number. 

The second mistake is treating valuation as a single negotiation rather than a signal that carries into the next round. We've seen founders take an aggressive valuation from a less discerning investor, only to face a painful down-round eighteen months later because growth couldn't catch up to the number. And the third, more technical mistake, is founders not distinguishing between pre-money and post-money terms clearly enough in the term sheet, which sounds basic, but in a market where deal velocity has increased sharply, we still see it trip up first-time founders regularly. 

5. Venture capital often dominates the startup scene, but your business covers a much broader range of financing solutions. What funding options are Saudi founders overlooking? 

Venture capital gets the headlines, but it's genuinely the wrong tool for a large share of the businesses we speak with. A founder running an asset-light logistics or fulfilment operation, for instance, is often better served by working capital or trade finance than by giving up equity to fund inventory or fleet expansion, particularly now that Saudi ports are handling record throughput and warehousing demand is outpacing supply. Similarly, businesses generating predictable card or POS receivables can access overdraft or receivables-based financing well before they'd qualify for a meaningful equity round, and without diluting the cap table for what is fundamentally working capital, not growth capital. 

At the other end of the spectrum, founders scaling into capital-intensive infrastructure, a data center build, a healthcare facility, an industrial plant tied to one of the localization programs should be thinking about project finance and structured debt long before they think about a growth equity round, because the risk-return profile of that kind of asset is genuinely better suited to debt investors than to venture funds. The Saudi fintech sector alone has grown from roughly 82 companies in 2020 toward a 2030 target of 525, and financing companies licensed by SAMA have expanded accordingly, which tells you the debt and structured finance infrastructure to support this kind of financing now actually exists locally. Founders who only ever speak to VCs are leaving a lot of that infrastructure unused. 

6. How important are cross-border partnerships in today's fundraising environment? 

Increasingly central, and for a very practical reason: Saudi Arabia's own capital base, while deep, is still building the full stack of expertise in some specialized verticals, deep tech, advanced manufacturing finance, certain climate technologies, where regional and international partners bring both capital and domain experience. We've also seen this play out at the sovereign level: HUMAIN, the PIF-backed AI company, has structured its own scale-up through partnerships with Nvidia, AMD, AWS and others rather than trying to build every layer domestically, and that same logic increasingly applies to how founders should think about their own cap tables. 

There's also a market-access dimension. A Saudi startup with a UAE, Egyptian, or Gulf-wide co-investor on its cap table typically finds it easier to expand into those markets, because that investor brings relationships and regulatory familiarity the founder doesn't have to build from scratch. For international investors, meanwhile, a credible local partner, someone who understands the specific licensing environment, the difference between operating from Riyadh versus a special economic zone, or how a giga-project tender actually works, meaningfully de-risks their entry. We see this constantly in our own work: cross-border deals close faster and on better terms when there's a trusted party on the ground on both sides of the table. 

7. What opportunities do you see in sectors such as AI, fintech, logistics, climate tech, healthcare, and industrial technology? 

Each of these is moving at a genuinely different pace, so it's worth taking them individually. AI is the most capital-intensive story in the Kingdom right now; HUMAIN alone has committed to a $100 billion technology investment program and is targeting up to 6.6 gigawatts of AI data center capacity by 2034, with partnerships already signed with Nvidia, AMD, AWS, Qualcomm and Cisco. That creates a large downstream opportunity for firms in power infrastructure, cooling technology, and enterprise AI applications layered on top of that compute base. 

Fintech remains the most mature vertical for founders and investors alike; SAMA-licensed finance companies have grown into the sixties, electronic payments now account for roughly 85% of retail transactions, and the central bank issued its first live open banking licenses in March 2026, which genuinely opens a new product category. Logistics is being reshaped by necessity as much as ambition: the $7 billion Landbridge rail project and continued Red Sea port investment are direct responses to regional shipping disruption, and cold chain and warehousing remain visibly underserved relative to demand. Healthcare is one of the largest reform stories in the Kingdom; the government is targeting private-sector contribution of up to 65% by 2030, with 290 hospitals and 2,300 primary care centers earmarked for privatization, which is a multi-decade PPP and asset-transfer opportunity. Climate tech and industrial technology are earlier-stage but tied directly to giga-project execution; NEOM, green hydrogen, and the localization of industrial manufacturing under the National Industrial Strategy all need capital and technology partners now, not in five years. 

8. What's one misconception international investors still have about Saudi Arabia? 

That it's a single, government-directed market where private capital plays a supporting role to sovereign wealth. That was arguably a fairer characterization five years ago; it isn't today. MAGNiTT's data on the 2025 Saudi VC market shows the investor base reaching its broadest and most international composition to date, and non-mega deals, the smaller, more genuinely private-market transactions, grew meaningfully alongside the headline rounds, which tells you liquidity is deepening across the stack, not just concentrating at the top. 

The other version of this misconception is timing risk, the assumption that Vision 2030 is a long-dated bet that won't pay off for years. In practice, we're already past the point where this is purely aspirational: fintech alone has gone from fewer than thirty licensed companies before 2020 to over sixty finance companies today, non-cash transactions hit their 70% target ahead of schedule, and the Kingdom posted a record year for both FDI and venture funding in the same twelve-month period. Investors who are still waiting for a clearer signal to enter are, in our assessment, already behind the founders and funds who moved two or three years ago. 

9. How do you see Saudi Arabia's investment ecosystem evolving by 2030? 

Three shifts stand out to us. First, we expect the venture and private capital base to keep localizing; Saudi-headquartered funds, family offices and sovereign vehicles already anchor most early and growth-stage rounds, and as more Saudi fund managers get their CMA licenses, that trend should deepen further rather than reverse. Second, we expect financing to diversify well beyond equity: the government's own $100 billion annual FDI target for 2030, alongside a healthcare PPP pipeline that includes a further $16.5 billion in targeted public-private partnerships and the Landbridge and port investments in logistics, all point toward debt, project finance and structured capital playing a much larger role in the ecosystem than they do today, which is exactly the space we operate in. 

Third, and most structurally significant, is that Saudi Arabia is positioning itself for reclassification onto deeper global capital pools, from MSCI frontier status toward more emerging and eventually developed-market benchmarks, mirroring the trajectory the broader GCC has been on. If the current pace of reform, privatization and sector diversification holds, by 2030 the more interesting question won't be whether international investors are looking at Saudi Arabia, but whether they got in early enough. 

Kholoud Hussein 

Saudi Arabia’s food and beverage landscape is entering one of its most dynamic periods in recent history. Dining has become a central expression of the Kingdom’s cultural transformation—fueled by an expanding middle class, rising disposable income, record spending on experiences, and a powerful shift toward homegrown concepts. As restaurants multiply across Riyadh, Jeddah, and emerging destination districts, one bottleneck remains stubbornly persistent: access to growth capital that reflects the real economics of hospitality.

Traditional financing tools—rigid bank loans, equity dilution, and short-term discount-driven customer acquisition—have long failed to match the realities of an industry defined by seasonality, thin margins, and escalating operating costs. This gap has created a critical need for financial models built specifically for restaurants, not adapted from generic SME templates. It is within this landscape that SPICE has emerged as one of the sector’s most closely watched disruptors.

Founded by a veteran entrepreneurial team with a two-decade track record in F&B technology, SPICE is introducing what it calls Dining Capital—a Sharia-compliant, zero-debt financing model that pre-purchases future dining credit to provide restaurants with upfront, non-dilutive cash tied directly to guest demand. At the same time, the company is building an invite-only dining platform designed to attract high-value customers, offering curated recommendations and instant rewards that strengthen restaurant loyalty without eroding brand equity.

With Saudi Arabia as its headquarters and primary growth market, SPICE is positioning itself at the intersection of fintech, hospitality, and Vision 2030’s experience-led economy. The Kingdom now represents nearly one-third of all POS transactions in the region’s foodservice sector, and as tourism accelerates and giga-projects set new expectations for hospitality, the demand for smart, aligned financing structures is only growing.

In this exclusive interview with Sharikat Mubasher, co-founder and CEO Zeid Husban discusses the economics behind Dining Capital, SPICE’s strategic alignment with Vision 2030, how the company underwrites risk, and why premium dining represents one of the most attractive investment categories across the GCC. He also reflects on past exits—including ifood.jo and POSRocket—and how those lessons shaped SPICE’s operational philosophy. As the company scales across Saudi Arabia and prepares for GCC expansion, Husban lays out a vision for a future in which growth capital, curated demand, and technology-driven guest experiences operate as a single, integrated ecosystem powering the region’s next generation of restaurant brands.

SPICE positions itself as a catalyst for a “premium dining movement.” How does your Sharia‑compliant, zero‑debt financing model reshape the way premium and fine‑dining restaurants access growth capital in Saudi Arabia today?

We started SPICE because, honestly, financing for restaurants is not easy and it’s broken. Banks still look at restaurants like any other SME. They expect fixed repayments every month, even though the F&B industry is faced with seasonality, volatility, and very thin margins. Great restaurants and their operators end up punished for investing in people, product, and the dining experience.

That is why we looked to build a solution, given our background in creating F&B tech solutions. Our answer to that is what we call Dining Capital. Instead of giving a loan with interest, we pre‑purchase future dining credit from the restaurant and give restaurants upfront, Sharia‑compliant cash that does not sit as debt on their balance sheet. That credit is then used over time as SPICE guests dine and pay through our consumer app.

So the “repayment” happens naturally through real visits that generate revenue, not through a fixed schedule that ignores how this business actually works. It lets premium venues grow, without resorting to discounts or short‑term fixes that hurt their brand. For us, that is how you genuinely support a premium dining movement in Saudi.

Saudi Arabia is seeing unprecedented momentum in the foodservice sector, with restaurants representing nearly a third of all POS transactions. How is SPICE aligning its investment strategy with Vision 2030 and the Kingdom’s rapidly expanding F&B landscape?

If you spend any time in Saudi Arabia today, you can feel how much dining has become part of the country’s new story. Vision 2030 put hospitality and tourism at the center, and you see it in how people go out, where they spend, and how quickly new concepts are opening. This is not just with nationals and residents, but tourists as well. 

We chose to make Riyadh our headquarters because we believe Saudi is where you can build truly category‑defining companies, not only for the region but globally. Every riyal of Dining Capital we deploy ends up as real spend at partner venues. That means more local brands, more jobs, and more reasons for residents and visitors to have a great dining experience with Saudi hospitality.

Our strategy is very focused. We choose to partner with select premium restaurants that we think should become part of the country’s dining fabric, and then we tie their funding directly to guest demand. That way, our growth, their growth, and Vision 2030’s push for an experience‑led economy are all moving in the same direction.

You’re offering what you call “Dining Capital” upfront cash with no interest and no fixed repayments. Can you walk us through the economics of this model and how you mitigate risk while still enabling restaurants to scale?

The model is quite simple and has no hidden intentions. We give a restaurant an upfront lump sum, and in return, we receive a larger pool of future dining credit that will be used by SPICE diners over time, who are invited to use our app. There is no interest, no fixed instalments, and no equity dilution. The restaurant is simply agreeing to honour this pre‑purchased credit at face value whenever our guests dine. Guests simply book and pay through the app. Every time they pay, they get rewarded with 20% cashback, which can add up to a significant amount. 

But that is why we need to manage risk very closely, which explains why we are selective with the brands we fund. We work only with premium and upper‑casual venues that meet high standards on consistency, concept, and brand. Second, we size each financing opportunity based on realistic future demand, using our experience, data, and technology.  Third, we do not just wire money and disappear. We actively drive demand through our invite‑only diners, so capital and demand always work together.

For the operator, it feels like getting growth equity without giving up ownership. This kind of working capital eliminates the headache of monthly repayment pressure. For us, it creates a new, Sharia‑compliant asset class that is directly backed by how often people dine at these venues.

On the consumer side, SPICE is building an invite‑only dining platform with concierge features and 20% instant rewards. How does your technology shape the guest experience, and what competitive advantage does this create for your restaurant partners?

On the consumer side, we are trying to build the app that serious diners wish already existed. SPICE is invite‑only. That’s why it feels more like a membership than a mass deals app, and every venue on it is handpicked. If a venue is on SPICE, it is because we would happily send our friends and family there. It is the app that people in the know use when they have to choose where to go. 

Inside the app, you can quickly find the right spot for a date, a business lunch, or a family dinner, then pay in‑app and receive 20 percent instant rewards on your bill. Over time, the product learns where you like to go, what kind of vibe you prefer, and even what kind of occasion you are planning. It starts to feel like a digital concierge that understands your taste.

For restaurants, that experience matters a lot. They are not getting random coupon hunters. They are getting high‑value guests who come for the experience first and appreciate that SPICE is tied to quality, not cheap deals. That combination of curated demand plus instant rewards is a strong edge for our partners.

Your team has a strong entrepreneurial track record, having led successful exits such as ifood.jo and POSRocket. How have these previous experiences informed SPICE’s operational strategy and its expansion approach in the GCC?

As founders, we have been in food and hospitality tech for almost twenty years now. We built ifood.jo, Jordan’s first food ordering platform, which was acquired by Delivery Hero, and POSRocket, a cloud POS for restaurants that was acquired by Foodics. So we have seen this industry from a lot of different angles, from the kitchen printer to the customer’s phone. More importantly, Wadi, Youssef, and I have built together, and we complement each other’s strengths. 

On the B2B side, we saw great operators struggling with cash flow, and we saw how banks often did not really understand restaurant risk. On the B2C side, we watched as diners were trained to chase discounts, which might look good in the short term but slowly erodes brands and guest trust. In fact, many diners don’t like to show they use discounts, especially when it comes to paying at premium restaurants. 

With SPICE, we are essentially solving the problems we kept running into. Operationally, we decided not to build just another F&B service. We are building a movement where capital, demand generation, and guest experience are tightly connected. That is also why our expansion plan is careful by design. We are 100% focused on Saudi first. After proving the model works and scales, we’ll take it into other markets in the GCC. 

Saudi Arabia is your primary focus today, but you’ve previously hinted at wider regional expansion. What can you share about SPICE’s plans across the Gulf, and what markets are you prioritizing next?

Saudi Arabia will always be home for SPICE. It is where we launched and where we are building the Dining Capital category. It is home not just for the brand but for our team and our families. But from the beginning, we knew the model would resonate across the Gulf.

Markets across the GCC have high dining‑out spend, very savvy consumers, and restaurants facing similar challenges with funding and loyalty. Yet no one has really owned the premium dining capital and cashback space in a way that feels curated and long-term. This category is non-existent, and we are essentially building from the ground up.

We plan to earn the right to expand by proving what we do in Saudi Arabia first. Once we have shown that Dining Capital can become part of how premium restaurants in Riyadh and other major cities fund growth, we will start rolling out into other Gulf markets where Sharia‑compliant, non‑debt funding and premium dining experiences are just as relevant.

In each market, we will adapt the curation to local taste, but our core stays the same, where we partner with recognised venues, provide zero‑debt growth capital, and enable an elevated, rewarding dining experience. Eventually, we want a SPICE member from Riyadh to land in Dubai or Kuwait, open the same app, and instantly feel at home.

Access to capital is still one of the biggest bottlenecks for restaurants looking to scale. From your perspective, what structural changes or financial innovations are needed to unlock the next wave of F&B growth in the Kingdom?

If you talk to operators in Saudi Arabia, many will tell you the same thing. Getting the first location off the ground is hard, but getting from one or two branches to a real group is often even harder, simply because the right kind of capital is not always available.

Banks tend to apply generic SME models that do not fully reflect how hospitality works. Equity investors often want to back platforms, not individual restaurant brands. So a lot of very good concepts get stuck in the middle, even while the overall market is booming. Starting a restaurant isn’t cheap either, with a few million riyals needed in upfront capital. 

We think the next wave of growth will come from a mix of new structures and better data. Instruments like Dining Capital, where funding is Sharia‑compliant, non‑dilutive, and repaid through actual guest visits, are one important piece. Another is using real transaction and behaviour data to underwrite restaurant performance instead of relying purely on static projections. That’s why we are investing heavily in our technology so we can model the data right, but also target the right audience for each brand. 

The other important priority is alignment with the KSA leadership’s vision for the country. As tourism and hospitality targets ramp up, you need funding tools that are designed specifically for restaurants in key locations, especially around giga‑projects and destination districts. With SPICE, we are trying to show what that can look like when you connect capital directly to demand and treat the dining experience itself as the asset.

With Sharia‑compliant financing and consumer rewards merging into a single ecosystem, where do you see SPICE in the next three to five years? Are external investments or new funding rounds part of that growth trajectory?

When we think about the next three to five years, we do not just think in terms of app metrics. We imagine a world where Dining Capital is a normal part of the conversation for premium restaurants across Saudi Arabia and the GCC.

If a group is planning a new branch or a new concept, we want them to reach out to us first and seek Dining Capital from SPICE. This isn’t just about lending once, but being a real partner in the growth journey of high-potential brands. On the diner side, if you care about where you eat and how you are rewarded, we want closing the bill with SPICE to feel like the natural way to end a great meal.

Right now, we are well-funded and focused on deploying capital to restaurants. At the end of the day, we want to be an active partner supporting the F&B ecosystem. In pioneering a new category around Dining Capital and helping define what premium dining in this region feels like, we hope to play a role in how restaurants grow and how guests experience and remember each meal.

Ghada Ismail

Every year, startups launch with big ambitions, exciting ideas, and dreams of becoming the next success story. Founders spend months building apps, designing products, and preparing launch plans. But many startups run into the same problem: they create something people do not actually need.

That is why validation matters.

Before investing serious time, money, and energy into a startup, founders need to know whether there is genuine demand for what they are building. Validation is not about killing creativity or slowing momentum. It is about making smarter decisions early and avoiding costly mistakes later.

Start With the Problem, Not the Product

A lot of entrepreneurs get excited about an idea and immediately jump into building the product. But successful startups usually begin with a real problem, not just a clever solution.

Ask yourself a few honest questions. What problem are you solving? Who experiences this problem every day? And is it frustrating enough that people would actively look for a solution?

The best way to answer these questions is by talking to people directly. Have conversations with potential users. Ask them about their experiences, frustrations, and current alternatives. Instead of trying to convince them that your idea is great, focus on listening.

When multiple people describe the same issue repeatedly, that is often a strong sign that you are solving something meaningful.

Define Your Audience Clearly

One common mistake founders make is trying to target everyone. In reality, validation works better when you focus on a specific group first.

Think carefully about who your ideal customer is. Are you targeting students, small businesses, working parents, freelancers, or enterprise companies? The clearer your audience, the easier it becomes to understand their behavior and needs.

For example, validating a fintech app for university students requires a completely different approach than validating software for logistics companies.

Knowing your audience also helps you understand how they currently solve the problem—and whether they would realistically switch to your solution.

Research the Market

Some founders worry when they discover competitors in the market. But competition is not always a bad sign. In many cases, it proves there is already demand.

Take time to study businesses operating in the same space. Look at their pricing, features, customer reviews, and overall positioning. Pay attention to complaints customers frequently mention because those gaps could become opportunities for your startup.

At the same time, avoid copying competitors blindly. Validation is not about building the same thing with a different logo. It is about understanding what customers still feel is missing.

And if you cannot find any competitors at all, that may also be worth questioning. Sometimes a market is untapped, but sometimes there is simply no demand.

Build a Simple Version First

You do not need a fully developed product to start validating your idea.

Many successful startups begin with a Minimum Viable Product, often called an MVP. This is a basic version of your idea, designed to quickly and cheaply test interest.

An MVP could be a landing page, a prototype, a waitlist, a short demo video, or even a social media page explaining your concept.

The goal is not perfection. The goal is learning.

Watch how people respond. Are they signing up? Asking questions? Sharing it with others? Or are they losing interest after the first interaction?

Real behavior tells you far more than polite compliments ever will.

Focus on Actions, Not Opinions

Friends and family will often encourage your idea because they want to support you. But encouragement is not validation.

The real question is whether people are willing to take action.

Would they join a waiting list? Book a demo? Pre-order the product? Pay for early access?

These actions matter because they show genuine interest. Many startup founders confuse positive feedback with actual demand, and the two are very different.

Someone saying “That sounds cool” is not the same as someone opening their wallet.

Test Whether People Will Pay

One of the biggest validation mistakes founders make is avoiding conversations about money.

A startup can solve a real problem and still fail if customers are not willing to pay enough for the solution.

Testing pricing early helps you understand whether your business model is realistic. Even simple experiments—such as different pricing options on a landing page or discussing budgets during customer interviews—can reveal valuable insights.

If people hesitate when pricing enters the conversation, you may need to rethink your positioning or value proposition.

To Wrap Things Up…

Building a startup always involves risk, but validation helps reduce unnecessary uncertainty. Instead of relying on guesses, founders learn directly from real people and real market behavior.

It may feel tempting to build quickly and figure things out later, but taking the time to validate first can save enormous amounts of time, money, and frustration in the future.

In the end, the strongest startup ideas are not just innovative; they solve real problems for real people.

Kholoud Hussein 

In the world of venture capital, mergers, and rapid-growth startups, few terms carry as much weight—or anxiety—as due diligence. It is the checkpoint between a startup’s ambition and an investor’s capital, the rigorous validation process that determines whether a business is truly worth the risk. Although often spoken about as a routine step, due diligence has evolved into a sophisticated, multilayered investigation that shapes the fate of fundraising rounds, acquisitions, and even long-term survival.

At its core, due diligence refers to the comprehensive assessment conducted by investors, acquirers, or financial institutions to evaluate a startup’s viability—financially, legally, operationally, and strategically. It is the process through which claims are tested, risks are measured, and assumptions are either validated or exposed. For early-stage founders, this is the moment when the narrative must finally match the numbers.

In practical terms, due diligence begins when an investor shows serious interest in a startup. The glossy pitch deck no longer suffices; instead, founders must provide access to detailed financial reports, customer metrics, intellectual property documentation, legal filings, product performance data, and more. Everything from revenue consistency to founder equity structure is scrutinized. The goal is simple: to ensure that what the startup says it is building aligns with what it actually operates.

This process typically spans several categories—financial, legal, technical, and commercial. Financial due diligence reveals whether revenues are stable or inflated, whether burn rate is manageable, and whether the business’s cost structure is built for scale. Legal due diligence uncovers potential landmines: unregistered trademarks, unsettled disputes, improper employment contracts, or shareholder conflicts that could hinder growth. Technical due diligence has become increasingly essential in a world dominated by AI, cloud software, and cybersecurity threats, as investors assess whether the product is robust, defensible, or even feasible at scale. Commercial due diligence, meanwhile, evaluates market potential—customer retention, competitive positioning, and sector dynamics.

For startups, due diligence functions as a double-edged sword. While it is often stressful and time-consuming, it also acts as a validation milestone. A company that passes rigorous due diligence signals maturity and credibility in the market. Investors tend to view such startups not just as promising, but as stable and trustworthy. In regions such as the GCC, where the venture capital landscape is accelerating rapidly, due diligence has become essential in separating hype from genuine scalability.

Startups are increasingly preparing for due diligence earlier than ever—sometimes before even seeking investment. Many adopt internal “data room” structures, organize compliance documentation, and maintain accurate financial records to avoid last-minute surprises. This preparation reflects a broader maturity in the ecosystem: as competition increases, investors demand cleaner, more transparent operations.

In Saudi Arabia, for example, the surge in venture capital activity under Vision 2030 has brought heightened attention to governance and operational resilience. With record-breaking investments across sectors like fintech, logistics, cloud services, and AI, startups are expected to demonstrate not only innovation but also sustainable growth paths supported by data. Due diligence is the mechanism ensuring that capital is deployed responsibly in this new economy.

Global investors entering the MENA region also rely heavily on robust due diligence to navigate fragmented regulations, young markets, and rapidly growing sectors. For many foreign funds, the depth and transparency of due diligence outcomes often determine whether they will green-light an investment in the region. Consequently, startups that maintain high-quality operational discipline gain a competitive edge—not just locally, but globally.

In essence, due diligence is not a barrier; it is a blueprint. For founders, preparing for it forces clarity of vision, discipline around metrics, and alignment across teams. For investors, it is the safeguard that ensures capital goes to companies with real potential. And for the broader startup ecosystem, it serves as a mechanism of integrity—one that helps shape sustainable growth.

As venture capital deepens its roots in emerging markets and competition for capital intensifies, due diligence will remain the defining test of a startup’s readiness. In the end, the companies that embrace transparency, maintain operational rigor, and deliver measurable results will be the ones that survive the scrutiny—and secure the funding needed to thrive.

Kholoud Hussein 

In the world of startup financing, terms like valuation, dilution, and runway tend to dominate founder conversations. But tucked inside most investment agreements is a clause that rarely makes headlines yet shapes the future ownership structure of almost every fast-growing company. That clause is pro-rata rights—a contractual mechanism that determines who gets to keep their stake as the company scales and raises more capital.

Pro-rata rights are often described as the investor’s right to “maintain their percentage ownership” in future funding rounds. While that definition is technically correct, the implications run much deeper. These rights shape investor behavior, influence founder–investor dynamics, and determine who benefits most when a startup’s valuation climbs. Understanding them is essential for both sides of the table.

At their core, pro-rata rights allow an investor to purchase additional shares in later financing rounds so their percentage ownership remains unchanged, even as the company issues new equity. Without this protection, every new round would dilute earlier investors. For example, a seed investor who owns 10% of a startup may see that drop to 5% after a Series A unless they are allowed to buy additional shares. Pro-rata rights give them the option—not the obligation—to maintain their 10% stake by participating in the round.

This matters because startups that succeed often grow far faster than early expectations. What begins as a small seed round at a modest valuation can escalate into tens or even hundreds of millions of dollars. Early shares bought at low prices become enormously valuable, and investors with pro-rata rights gain privileged access to this upside. It is one of the reasons venture capitalists aggressively negotiate for these rights: they ensure participation in future growth without having to fight for allocation.

For founders, the picture is more complex. Granting pro-rata rights is common, especially in early rounds when capital is scarce and negotiating leverage tilts toward investors. But as the company grows, founders may find themselves juggling competing demands. A Series A lead investor may want a large allocation. Existing seed investors may want to exercise their pro-rata rights. Strategic investors may request room in the round. Suddenly, every percentage point becomes a negotiation.

The tension arises because pro-rata commitments eat into the allocation a startup can offer new investors. In hot rounds where demand exceeds supply, founders sometimes pressure early investors to waive or reduce their pro-rata rights. This is where relationships matter. Investors who have supported the company during tougher periods tend to expect—and receive—priority. Those with weak engagement may be sidelined. The rights are contractual, but their enforcement often plays out in the subtleties of venture dynamics.

For startups, pro-rata rights also have strategic value. Investors who maintain their ownership across rounds signal confidence to the market. When respected early funds double down, it sends a message to future investors that the company is worth backing. Many startups highlight this support during fundraising, positioning it as validation that the business is on the right trajectory. In this sense, pro-rata participation becomes part of the startup’s signaling strategy.

However, there is a trade-off. If every investor insists on full pro-rata participation, founders may find themselves with little room to bring in new partners—even when those new investors could add strategic value. This is especially true in sectors like fintech, energy, and AI where industry-specific expertise can accelerate growth. Founders often negotiate flexibility into pro-rata clauses to preserve room for strategic investors later.

The importance of pro-rata rights becomes even clearer during growth rounds. As valuations rise, the cost of maintaining equity increases sharply. Early investors with limited fund size may struggle to exercise full pro-rata rights, particularly in late-stage rounds where investments can reach tens of millions of dollars. This creates opportunities for secondary transactions, where investors sell part of their stake to new funds that are eager to join the cap table. In these cases, pro-rata rights become a negotiation tool—one that can unlock liquidity or leverage during fundraising.

For founders, the key is not to fear pro-rata rights but to understand how they interact with long-term capital strategy. Strong investors using their rights often reflect confidence in the company. But overly rigid pro-rata structures can limit flexibility in future rounds. Negotiating a balanced approach—protective for investors but adaptable for the company—is part of building a resilient fundraising framework.

Ultimately, pro-rata rights are about control, confidence, and long-term alignment. They ensure that investors who take early risk can continue participating in a company’s success. They help startups secure committed partners who remain invested not only financially but strategically. And they form part of the invisible architecture that underpins venture investing.

In a startup world defined by rapid growth and constant change, pro-rata rights may not grab headlines. But they quietly determine who gets to stay on the journey—and who benefits most when the destination turns out to be far more valuable than anyone expected.

Kholoud Hussein 

In the venture capital world, funding rounds often serve as shorthand for a startup’s trajectory. A company that raises capital at a higher valuation than its previous round is said to have achieved an “up round,” a signal of growth and investor confidence. A “down round,” by contrast, occurs when the valuation falls, often reflecting operational challenges or deteriorating market conditions.

Between these two scenarios lies a third, less discussed but increasingly common outcome: the flat round.

A flat round occurs when a startup raises new capital at roughly the same valuation as its previous funding round. In simple terms, the company secures fresh investment, but its valuation does not increase. While this may appear neutral at first glance, flat rounds carry nuanced implications for founders, investors, and the broader startup ecosystem.

Understanding the Mechanics of a Flat Round

In a typical venture funding cycle, startups aim to demonstrate progress between rounds. This progress may come in the form of revenue growth, product development milestones, market expansion, or user acquisition. These achievements justify a higher valuation in the next round.

A flat round suggests that while the company has not lost value, it has not increased it significantly either. Investors are willing to provide additional capital to support continued operations, but they do not see sufficient traction to justify a higher valuation.

For founders, the outcome can be both reassuring and sobering. On one hand, a flat round avoids the dilution and reputational damage often associated with a down round. On the other hand, it signals that the company has entered a phase of slower perceived momentum.

Why Flat Rounds Have Become More Common

Flat rounds tend to emerge during periods of market recalibration. When venture capital markets tighten or economic uncertainty rises, investors often become more cautious about aggressive valuations. Startups that might previously have commanded higher valuations may instead raise capital at the same level as their previous round.

This dynamic has been particularly visible in recent global venture cycles, where high-growth companies raised funding during periods of exuberant valuations. As capital markets normalized, many of those startups faced pressure to align valuations with more conservative benchmarks.

In such conditions, flat rounds function as a compromise between founders and investors. Investors avoid overpaying for equity, while founders maintain valuation stability and buy time to demonstrate stronger performance.

The Strategic Value of a Flat Round

Despite the lack of valuation growth, flat rounds can play a constructive role in a startup’s development.

First, they extend the company’s financial runway. Startups often require additional capital to refine their product, expand into new markets, or reach profitability. A flat round provides the resources needed to pursue those objectives without forcing a dramatic valuation reset.

Second, flat rounds can stabilize the cap table. Down rounds frequently trigger anti-dilution clauses that shift ownership toward existing investors, potentially complicating future fundraising. By maintaining the same valuation, a flat round avoids these structural disruptions.

Third, a flat round can reset expectations. Rather than chasing aggressive growth metrics to justify escalating valuations, founders can focus on operational efficiency, customer retention, and sustainable revenue models.

For investors, flat rounds represent an opportunity to reinforce portfolio companies with long-term potential. By supporting the startup through a transitional phase, investors position themselves to benefit if the company regains momentum in future rounds.

Risks and Perception Challenges

While flat rounds are not inherently negative, they can influence market perception. Venture capital is a narrative-driven ecosystem, and valuation trends often shape how a company is viewed by future investors.

A flat round may raise questions about growth velocity or market traction. Potential investors in subsequent rounds may scrutinize performance metrics more closely to determine whether the company has regained upward momentum.

There is also the risk of “valuation stagnation.” If a startup raises multiple flat rounds without demonstrating measurable progress, confidence can erode among both investors and employees. Equity incentives may lose motivational power if employees perceive limited upside potential.

When Flat Rounds Make Strategic Sense

Flat rounds tend to be most effective when they are part of a deliberate strategic reset rather than a reactive measure. Companies entering new markets, pivoting their business model, or investing heavily in research and development may temporarily prioritize capability building over short-term growth metrics.

In these situations, maintaining valuation stability while securing additional capital allows leadership teams to focus on long-term competitiveness.

Moreover, in sectors where innovation cycles are longer—such as deep technology, climate tech, or advanced manufacturing—flat rounds may simply reflect the time required for technologies to mature before commercial breakthroughs occur.

A Signal of Maturing Venture Markets

As startup ecosystems evolve, funding patterns tend to diversify. Early-stage ecosystems often emphasize rapid valuation growth and headline-making investment rounds. More mature ecosystems develop a wider range of financing outcomes, including flat rounds and structured extensions.

In this sense, the increasing visibility of flat rounds reflects a broader maturation of venture capital markets. Investors are becoming more disciplined, founders more pragmatic, and valuations more closely aligned with underlying business fundamentals.

To conclude, a flat round occupies the middle ground in startup finance. It signals stability without acceleration, caution without retreat. For founders, it offers breathing room to refine strategy and strengthen fundamentals. For investors, it represents a calculated vote of confidence in a company’s long-term potential.

In a venture landscape where valuations can fluctuate dramatically, flat rounds remind stakeholders that growth is rarely linear. Sometimes, maintaining the same valuation is not a setback, but a strategic pause before the next phase of expansion.

Kholoud Hussein 

In the startup world, speed has always mattered. But over the past decade, the definition of speed has changed. It no longer means launching fast and scaling recklessly. It means learning fast. That shift in mindset sits at the heart of what is known as the lean startup.

The lean startup approach, popularized by entrepreneur and author Eric Ries in his book The Lean Startup, challenges traditional business planning. Instead of spending years developing a product in isolation and then bringing it to market, the lean model encourages founders to build quickly, test early, and adapt continuously.

At its core, a lean startup is a method for reducing risk. It is not about being cheap. It is about being efficient with time, capital, and effort.

The Problem with Traditional Startup Thinking

Historically, startups followed a predictable script. Write a detailed business plan. Raise capital. Build a full-featured product. Launch. Market aggressively. Hope customers respond.

The flaw in this sequence is simple: it assumes the founders already know what customers want. In reality, many early-stage assumptions are wrong. Markets shift. Customer behavior surprises. Product features that seemed essential often prove irrelevant.

When companies discover these mismatches too late, the cost is high. Resources are exhausted. Investors lose confidence. The company collapses under the weight of untested assumptions.

The lean startup framework was designed to prevent that outcome.

The Build–Measure–Learn Loop

The lean methodology revolves around one continuous cycle: build, measure, learn.

First, build a minimum viable product (MVP). This is not a prototype for internal discussion. It is a basic, usable version of the product that allows real customers to interact with it. The goal is not perfection. The goal is feedback.

Second, measure how customers respond. Do they use the product as expected? Do they return? Are they willing to pay? Which features matter most?

Third, learn from the data. If assumptions prove incorrect, the company pivots. If evidence supports the hypothesis, the company iterates and improves.

This loop continues until the business finds product–market fit, the point where demand becomes consistent and measurable.

Validated Learning Over Vanity Metrics

A defining characteristic of lean startups is their focus on validated learning. Growth in social media followers or website traffic may look impressive, but those metrics do not always reflect real demand or sustainable revenue.

Lean startups concentrate on actionable metrics: customer acquisition cost, lifetime value, retention rate, and conversion rate. These numbers provide insight into whether the business model works at scale.

By grounding decisions in data rather than optimism, founders reduce uncertainty and avoid expensive missteps.

Capital Efficiency as Strategy

The lean approach also reshaped how startups think about capital. Instead of raising large amounts of funding to execute a fixed plan, lean startups treat capital as fuel for experimentation.

Small, controlled tests replace large, irreversible bets. Marketing campaigns are piloted before expansion. Features are released incrementally rather than all at once. Hiring follows traction, not projections.

This discipline often extends the runway, the amount of time a startup can operate before running out of cash. More runway means more opportunities to refine the model and reach profitability.

The Pivot: A Strategic Reset

One of the most misunderstood elements of lean startups is the pivot. A pivot is not a failure. It is a structured course correction based on evidence.

Some of the most successful companies began with entirely different ideas. What distinguishes lean startups is their willingness to change direction early, before resources are depleted.

A pivot might involve targeting a new customer segment, altering the pricing model, or simplifying the product offering. The decision is not emotional. It is data-driven.

Why Lean Still Matters

More than a decade after its introduction, the lean startup methodology remains central to modern entrepreneurship. In a business environment defined by uncertainty, speed alone is not enough. Precision matters. Adaptability matters.

Lean startups succeed not because they avoid failure, but because they fail intelligently and early. They treat uncertainty as a variable to manage rather than a threat to fear.

In an era where capital markets fluctuate and competition intensifies, the lean mindset offers something valuable: a structured way to build companies grounded in evidence, discipline, and continuous learning.

For founders navigating today’s volatile markets, that may be the most sustainable advantage of all.

Noha Gad

In the dynamic world of startups, founders chase breakthroughs amid fierce competition, while investors hunt for the next big opportunity in a sea of pitches. In recent years, we have seen a major shift as investing in startups is no longer limited to venture capital (VC) firms. It increasingly includes individual investors who use technological tools and data to steer capital directly into the startups they care about and believe in. Angel syndicates emerged as a game-changer, pooling resources to fuel innovation and deliver shared rewards.

What are angel syndicates?

An angel syndicate is an informal group of individuals and/or angel investors who pool their resources together to invest in startups, normally via a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV), a separate company with its own balance sheet that can be established as a trust, a corporation, a limited partnership, or a Limited Liability Company (LLC).

Each member of the group may not qualify as a BA themselves, but together they have access to more opportunities. One or two investors may "lead" the syndicate.

These high-net-worth individuals invest some of their own money into startups, typically in exchange for equity. The total amount invested will probably be lower than funding from a VC firm or a bank; however, founders can receive cash much earlier compared to traditional funding routes or from bigger investors.

In addition to investing in early-stage deals, an angel syndicate allows a startup founder to deal with just one representative of the syndicate, rather than with 10 or 20 individuals.

How do angel syndicates work?

At the beginning, the syndicate lead must secure an allocation or a piece of the round. They do this from their source of deal flow, either from inbound interest from a founder or via cold outreach. Once leaders find a deal they deem worthy, they will bring it to the syndicate members to choose to collectively invest in the startup.

A syndicate lead can request more info, such as milestones reached, business model, market size, team, financial data, as well as the term sheet, to determine and regulate the relationship between investors once the investment vehicle has been materialized.

To close the deal, the SPV will be created, which will be the party that will execute the investment in the startup. The important decisions will be made by the leader. The expenses related to the creation of the investment vehicle are usually equally paid by the investors, regardless of the amount invested.

Benefits of syndicate investing

• Better deal access. By forming a syndicate, investors can pool their resources and invest a larger amount in each deal. Syndicating an investment this way is frequently required to gain access to the most competitive opportunities alongside VC firms, since founders may have high minimum investment requirements.
• Portfolio diversity. Syndicate investing allows angels to build larger portfolios. By investing with an angel syndicate and increasing portfolio size, investors can significantly increase the probability of tripling or quintupling their invested capital across the entire portfolio
• Shared deal flow and due diligence. Syndicate investing allows angel investors to pool their knowledge, experience, and resources. By leveraging the collective intelligence of the entire angel syndicate, they are able to source more opportunities and carry out more informed due diligence on the startups they review. 
• Simplicity. The rise of online syndication platforms made it easier for investors to participate in syndicate investing. These platforms provide a central location where investors can connect, identify and evaluate potential investment opportunities, and manage their investments. 

How do angel syndicates support startups' businesses?

• Financial backing: Startups can secure substantial capital infusions by pooling resources from multiple investors, often enabling larger funding rounds than a single angel could offer alone. This supports critical business functions such as product development, team expansion, and market entry strategies.
• Guidance and mentorship: syndicates deliver invaluable mentorship and strategic guidance from experienced lead investors and syndicate members. Their collective networks open doors to potential customers, partners, and subsequent VC opportunities, accelerating growth and credibility in competitive ecosystems.
• Reducing administrative burdens: When a lead handles due diligence and negotiations, this will reduce administrative burdens on founders, leading to quicker deal closures and freeing up time for core business activities. 

In summary, angel syndicates revolutionize early-stage investing by offering startups not just essential capital but also mentorship, networks, and streamlined processes that propel business growth amid fierce competition. Investors, in turn, gain access to premium deals, diversified portfolios, and shared due diligence, amplifying their chances for substantial returns without the isolation of solo ventures.

Noha Gad

The tourism sector in Saudi Arabia is witnessing a historic and transformative change, reinforcing the Kingdom’s position as a global tourism powerhouse. This strategic shift is a cornerstone of Vision 2030, which targets increasing tourism’s contribution to the national gross domestic product (GDP) from 3% to 10% by 2030, and aims to attract 150 million visitors annually by the end of the decade.

During the first half (H1) of 2025, the total number of inbound tourists in Saudi Arabia reached 14.3 million tourists, with inbound tourism spending estimated at SAR 90.5billion, according to recent figures released by the Ministry of Tourism. Additionally, the tourism hospitality facilities in the Kingdom recorded an overall occupancy rate of over 51% during the third quarter (Q3) of 2025, with Revenue Per Available Room (RevPAR) standing at SAR  154 in the same quarter. 

Driving this ambition is a dual commitment to sustainability and technological innovation. The Kingdom is not merely expanding its tourism offerings, which span from the pristine Red Sea coast and the ancient Nabatean tombs of AlUla to futuristic megaprojects like NEOM, but is doing so with a foundational pledge to environmental stewardship. 

Also, the Kingdom is at the forefront of integrating cutting-edge technologies, such as Artificial Intelligence (AI), Virtual Reality (VR), and Augmented Reality (AR), to revolutionize the visitor experience and operational efficiency. From AI-powered personalized itineraries and smart city management to immersive VR previews of heritage sites and AR-enhanced cultural exhibitions, technology is becoming the invisible backbone of Saudi tourism.

Green tourism in Saudi Arabia 

Saudi Arabia is putting sustainability at the core of its tourism strategies, particularly through eco-tourism integrated into its latest destination concepts that protect and preserve natural habitats and local wildlife. A range of nature reserves have already been established, including the Harrat al-Harrah Reserve, King Salman Bin Abdulaziz Royal Reserve, and Prince Mohammed bin Salman Royal Reserve. The National Center for Wildlife works to protect, develop, and resettle ecosystems and biodiversity, in addition to treating risks related to wildlife.

The Kingdom’s national initiatives, like the Saudi Green Initiative (SGI) and the National Tourism Strategy (NTS), mandate that growth must be sustainable, regenerative, and aligned with ambitious conservation targets. For instance, the SGI aims to reduce carbon emissions by 278 million tons annually by 2030 and increase the percentage of protected land and marine areas to 30% of the Kingdom's total area. Therefore, all tourism giga-projects are required to align with these goals. The 30% protection target is particularly crucial, as many projects, like the Red Sea Project, are located within or adjacent to protected zones, mandating a regenerative approach that enhances the environment.

The NTS targets implementing guidelines for energy, water, and waste management across new and existing destinations, acting as the operational link between the SGI's high-level goals and on-the-ground tourism development.

Giga projects, such as the Red Sea project, NEOM, and Al Ula, are large-scale experiments and benchmarks for building tourism from the ground up on green principles. The Red Sea project, spanning an archipelago of 90 islands scattered along the western coast of Saudi Arabia, targets developing luxury resorts using 100% clean energy, aiming for 100% carbon neutrality. Al Ula region, Saudi Arabia’s historical open-air museum, is expected to be on the global tourist radar, combining heritage with modern sustainable worldviews. This project is expected to contribute to carbon neutrality in the long term. 

All mega- and gig-projects underscore the Saudi government’s efforts to forge a future where tradition, innovation, and sustainability go hand-in-hand. According to the World Tourism Barometer, published by UN Tourism in January 2025, Saudi Arabia was one of the best-performing destinations in the world for 2024, seeing a tourism uplift of over 69% for the full 12-month period compared to 2019.

Digital tools driving Saudi Arabia's sustainable tourism

Smart tourism in Saudi Arabia refers to the integration of advanced technologies, such as artificial intelligence, virtual and augmented reality, and smart city infrastructure, into the travel and tourism experience. It aims to enhance convenience, personalization, and sustainability for both domestic and international visitors.

Building upon its sustainable foundation, Saudi Arabia is strategically deploying advanced technologies to create seamless, personalized, and immersive visitor experiences. These technologies are integral to managing tourism growth efficiently while elevating engagement to world-class standards.

AI serves as the central nervous system of this new tourism ecosystem. Beyond powering personalized recommendations on platforms like the official Visit Saudi portal, AI is crucial for operational sustainability and management. It is used for predictive analytics to optimize energy and water use in large resorts, manage visitor flows to prevent overcrowding at sensitive heritage sites, and provide real-time, multilingual assistance through AI-powered chatbots and virtual concierges. 

For immersion and accessibility, Virtual Reality (VR) and Augmented Reality (AR) are transforming how visitors explore Saudi heritage and future destinations. Before travel, VR enables potential tourists to take digital journeys through destinations like the ancient tombs of Hegra in AlUla or the futuristic models of NEOM. Platforms like the Metaverse let visitors explore Saudi landmarks from anywhere, offering a glimpse into the Kingdom’s rich heritage, no matter where they are in the world.

On-site, AR applications enrich the physical experience; for instance, at historical locations, visitors can use their smartphones or AR glasses to see historical recreations superimposed on ruins, receive interactive guided narrations, or access instant translation of inscriptions, bringing millennia of history to life in an engaging, educational format. Interactive museums, such as the International Fair and Museum of the Prophet’s Biography and Islamic Civilization, turn history into an experience through screens, sound, and smart displays. Historic and cultural sites like AlUla, Diriyah, and Jeddah’s Al-Balad offer AR experiences that let visitors interact with stories from the past.

Key smart tourism platforms in Saudi Arabia

The smart tourism ecosystem in Saudi Arabia is supported by several key digital platforms, ranging from official government portals to giga-project-specific applications. These platforms leverage AI, data analytics, and integrated services to enhance the visitor journey from planning to post-trip.

• ‘Visit Saudi’ portal and application is the official national tourism platform that serves as the primary digital gateway for all international and domestic tourists. It offers AI-driven personalized itinerary planning, destination discovery, event bookings, and integrated visa application links. 
• Nusuk is the official unified digital platform for pilgrims performing Hajj and Umrah, managed by the Ministry of Hajj and Umrah. It offers end-to-end journey management, including eVisa, electronic permit issuance, accommodation booking, flight packages, and health services. The platform uses data analytics for crowd management and a seamless spiritual experience.
• Tawakkalna app. Thanks to its robust identity verification infrastructure, this application is integrated into the tourism and events sector. It provides a secure digital identity, via Absher integration, for fast-track entry at major events, festivals, and tourist attractions, reducing queues and enhancing security.

As Vision 2030 continues to unfold, Saudi Arabia’s model offers a forward-looking blueprint for how destinations can grow responsibly. It demonstrates that with clear vision, supportive policy, and strategic investment, tourism can be a force for economic vitality, cultural celebration, and environmental preservation. This transformation in the Saudi tourism sector represents a purposeful integration of environmental stewardship and technological innovation. By establishing a firm green foundation through national initiatives and advancing a sophisticated smart toolbox with artificial intelligence, immersive tech, and data-driven platforms, the Kingdom is not merely expanding its tourism sector; it is redefining its future. 

Ghada Ismail

In today’s startup economy, funding stories usually focus on big venture capital rounds and billion-dollar valuations. But behind the scenes, another financial layer is quietly reshaping the investment landscape, which is the secondary market. It’s becoming increasingly important as startups stay private longer and investors look for earlier liquidity.

So, What Exactly Is a Secondary Market?

In simple terms, the secondary market is where existing shares of a startup are bought and sold between investors, rather than issued by the company.

• In a primary market, a startup raises money by issuing new shares, and the cash goes directly to the company.
• In a secondary market, shareholders like founders, early employees, or angel investors sell their shares to other investors, and the cash goes to the seller, not the startup.

No new capital enters the business, but ownership changes hands.

Why Does It Exist?

Startups today often take 7–10 years to reach an IPO or acquisition. During that long wait, early investors and employees often hold paper wealth without access to real liquidity.

This is where the secondary market plays a role:

• Founders and early employees can sell a portion of their shares without waiting for an exit.
• Angel investors or early VCs can partially cash out and reallocate capital to new startups.
• New investors gain access to high-growth companies that aren’t raising fresh primary capital anymore.

In short, it creates liquidity in a traditionally illiquid asset class.

Who’s Involved?

Sellers may include:

• Founders seeking financial flexibility or diversification.
• Employees with vested stock options.
• Early-stage investors reducing risk or locking in profits.

Buyers are typically:

• Growth-stage venture funds.
• Sovereign wealth funds or family offices.
• Corporates or secondary-focused investment firms.

Why It’s Important to the Startup Ecosystem

1. Supports Founder and Employee Stability
Secondary sales allow founders to secure financial stability without exiting the company. This reduces pressure to sell early and helps them stay committed for the long term. Employees, especially in fast-growing startups, view liquidity opportunities as part of their compensation, making the company more attractive for talent.

2. Encourages Capital Recycling
When angel investors or early VCs exit part of their stake, they can reinvest in new startups. This creates a healthier, self-sustaining investment ecosystem.

3. No Share Dilution
Unlike primary fundraising, secondary transactions don’t dilute ownership. This makes it attractive for startups that want to reward shareholders without changing equity structures.

But It’s Not Without Challenges

Secondary market activity must be carefully managed. Common concerns include:

• Valuation Disputes: What is the real price per share in a private company with no public market?
• Cap Table Complications: Too many small or misaligned shareholders can create governance challenges.
• Right of First Refusal (ROFR): Most startups legally control who can buy shares, which can slow negotiations.
• Investor Misalignment: New investors buying heavily in secondary markets might pressure for an early exit or faster returns.

Examples and Global Relevance

Globally, companies like SpaceX, Stripe, and Databricks regularly run structured secondary programs, allowing employees and early investors to sell a portion of their shares.

In emerging ecosystems such as Saudi Arabia and the wider MENA region, secondary transactions are becoming more common, especially as startups reach growth-stage funding and sovereign wealth funds show increasing interest.

Why It Matters?

As private companies stay private longer and valuations soar, the traditional idea that investors must wait for an IPO to see returns is fading. Secondary markets are now a strategic tool:

• For founders: financial safety without losing control.
• For investors: faster liquidity and portfolio rebalancing.
• For ecosystems: better capital circulation and maturity.

Wrapping Things Up…

Secondary markets used to be a quiet corner of the investment world. Today, they’re a key part of how modern startup ecosystems function. They provide liquidity, reduce risk, reward early contributors, and help capital flow more efficiently, all while allowing startups to keep growing without going public too early.

Mohamed Ramzy

Amid the rapid digital transformation sweeping across the food and beverage sector (F&B), technology companies play a vital role in supporting entrepreneurs and enhancing operational efficiency.

Among the most prominent of these companies is Foodics, a key player in the markets where it operates. The company maintains direct offices in five main markets—Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Egypt, Kuwait, and Jordan, while its advanced technological solutions reach over 30 countries worldwide.

Through its integrated restaurant and café management systems, Foodics has significantly contributed to improving efficiency, optimizing performance, and enabling restaurant owners to expand and grow their businesses.

In this interview, Bilal Zahran, Regional General Manager of Foodics for Egypt and the UAE, speaks with Sharikat Mubasher about the company’s expansion plans in Egypt and across the region, explaining how Foodics’ mission goes beyond providing digital solutions to focus on empowering entrepreneurs and small and medium enterprises (SMEs) to manage their operations more efficiently.

What are the main services and solutions you offer to entrepreneurs and startups in the restaurant sector?

The company provides numerous solutions and products that serve startups in the restaurant and café industry and facilitate their business operations.

We offer an integrated point-of-sale (POS) system specifically designed for restaurants, in addition to accounting applications and solutions tailored to their needs.

Recently, we launched the Foodics BI business intelligence tool, which represents a major leap in this field. It enables restaurant owners to analyze their data with greater insight, understand customer behavior, accurately track daily performance, and predict future trends. This translates into well-informed decisions that enhance operational efficiency and support long-term growth. Simply, this tool turns data into a true source of power for any business.

How do your solutions specifically empower small and medium enterprises?

We focus on simplifying operational processes for SME owners. Our solutions help them manage sales, inventory, and data effectively, reducing administrative burdens and opening doors for expansion.

We also provide customized training programs to ensure our tools are used in the simplest and most efficient way possible.

Today, more than 33,500 active restaurant branches worldwide use Foodics technologies as of the end of the first half of 2025, with the total value of transactions processed through the Foodics platform exceeding $6 billion.

What distinguishes Foodics’ solutions from others available in the market?

What sets us apart is that we do not merely provide technological tools; we deliver comprehensive and user-friendly solutions that address the diverse needs of restaurants and cafés, both large and small.

We focus especially on empowering small and medium enterprises with practical solutions that grant them a sustainable competitive advantage and help them manage their businesses with high efficiency.

You mentioned that technology is no longer an option but a necessity. How does Foodics translate this vision into tangible support for entrepreneurs?

We translate this vision by developing integrated solutions that cover all aspects of operational processes, while offering continuous support channels to help clients keep pace with rapid changes.

We do not merely offer a product, but we offer a strategic partnership that accompanies entrepreneurs on their journey of digital transformation and growth.

To what extent can artificial intelligence enhance the efficiency of entrepreneurs in this sector?

Artificial intelligence has become a fundamental component capable of improving the customer experience through smart recommendations, optimizing costs by managing resources more precisely, and forecasting consumption patterns to meet demand.

These capabilities empower entrepreneurs to make faster decisions and deliver more competitive and sustainable services.

What are Foodics’ expansion plans for the coming phase?

We are working to strengthen our presence in the Egyptian market strategically and thoughtfully, by launching advanced technological solutions that directly address the needs of the fast-growing restaurant and café sector.

Our efforts focus on offering more integrated products that help entrepreneurs manage sales, inventory, and customer experiences, while introducing business intelligence and advanced analytics tools.

For us, Egypt is not merely an important market; it is a central hub within our regional strategy.

How do you assess the Egyptian market’s response to Foodics’ solutions compared to other markets?

The response in Egypt has been exceptionally strong. We have witnessed great enthusiasm from entrepreneurs and restaurant owners to adopt our digital solutions.

The Egyptian market is characterized by digital readiness and high growth rates, along with a growing awareness of the importance of technology as a fundamental tool for continuity and expansion.

Compared with other markets, Egypt is more flexible and adaptive to new solutions, making it a promising and ideal market for expansion.

How do you view Egypt’s future position on the regional and global technology map?

Egypt possesses all the necessary ingredients to become a regional hub for technology and innovation, starting from its infrastructure, through its human capital, to its strategic geographic location.

If these assets are optimally utilized, the country can achieve a prominent global position in the near future.

When expanding regionally, what are the main challenges you face, and how do you overcome them?

The key challenges lie in the differences in digital infrastructure, regulations, and market needs, as what works effectively in one country may not be as suitable in another.

We overcome this by gaining deep local market insight, engaging directly with customers, and developing flexible, adaptable solutions.

We also build strategic partnerships with key stakeholders in each market, which helps us deliver practical, relevant solutions and enhances our ability to succeed and sustain growth.

How does Foodics balance meeting current market needs with shaping the future?

We follow a dual strategy: First, addressing daily market needs through practical and efficient solutions.
Second, continuously investing in innovation, artificial intelligence, and advanced analytics to ensure our clients’ readiness for the future and their ability to compete in a rapidly changing environment.

In conclusion, Foodics believes that innovation and partnerships are the foundation for building a more efficient and sustainable future for the food and beverage sector, an approach that reinforces Egypt’s role as a regional hub for technology and innovation.

Translated by: Ghada Ismail

Noha Gad

The commerce landscape is undergoing a significant transformation in 2025, driven by rapid technological advancements and changing consumer behaviors. Traditional retail and e-commerce are evolving beyond simple online transactions into immersive, engaging, and socially connected experiences. This shift reflects the importance of integrating technology, social media, and sustainability principles into how consumers discover, interact with, and purchase products and services. Thus, new types of commerce have emerged to redefine the relationship between brands and customers, creating innovative avenues for engagement, personalization, and convenience.

One of the most notable trends shaping commerce today is the rise of social commerce that integrates shopping experiences seamlessly into social media platforms. This type of commerce allows brands to engage directly with audiences, showcase products in real time, and drive immediate sales, creating a highly interactive retail experience.

Augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) technologies also revolutionize how consumers shop online by offering immersive and interactive digital experiences. Virtual try-ons, 3D product visualizations, and fully virtual stores enable customers to make informed purchase decisions from the comfort of their homes. 

Additionally, sustainability-driven commerce is another critical and rapidly growing trend that reflects consumers’ increasing preference for eco-friendly, ethical, and transparent shopping practices. Brands that embed sustainability into their business models, from sourcing and packaging to circular economy initiatives, are gaining trust and loyalty in a market where environmental responsibility is no longer optional.

In this blog, we will discover more about key trends that reshape the commerce landscape and how these shifting paradigms highlight a future where commerce is not just transactional, but experiential, interactive, and responsible.

Social commerce 

This term refers to the integration of e-commerce features directly within social media platforms, allowing users to discover, engage with, and purchase products without leaving their favorite applications. This trend gained rapid popularity among consumers who increasingly rely on social networks not only for social interaction but also for product recommendations, reviews, and seamless shopping experiences. 

Social commerce is witnessing significant growth thanks to multiple features, such as shoppable posts, stories, and in-app checkout options that simplify purchasing. These features reduce friction by allowing users to buy products directly through social media feeds, eliminating the need to navigate to external websites. Also, the integration of chatbots and customer service tools within social platforms enhances personalized shopping assistance and builds customer trust.

This type of commerce has a great impact on the way consumers discover brands and makes shopping more interactive and community-driven. For brands, social commerce opens new channels for storytelling, customer feedback, and direct engagement, enabling more personalized marketing strategies that foster loyalty and repeat business.

Live commerce

Live commerce integrates live video streaming with real-time shopping, creating an interactive experience where brands and influencers showcase products directly to an engaged audience. This type leverages the excitement and immediacy of live broadcasts to drive instant purchasing decisions, transforming the traditional sales funnel into a dynamic, entertainment-driven event. 

One of live commerce’s main strengths is the ability to interact with viewers in real time via chat, polls, and question-and-answer sessions. This interaction builds trust, answers consumer questions instantly, and encourages spontaneous purchases by creating a sense of urgency with limited-time offers and exclusive promotions.

This type of commerce enables brands to demonstrate products in action, showcasing features, benefits, and use cases more vividly than traditional online listings. It also features deeper emotional connections with consumers, ultimately reducing product returns and helping consumers make informed decisions.

AR and VR commerce

AR and VR transform online shopping by creating interactive experiences that bridge the gap between physical and digital retail. These technologies enable consumers to visualize products in a realistic context, enhancing confidence in purchase decisions and reducing the sense of uncertainty that often comes with online shopping. One of the biggest challenges in online shopping is the inability to physically experience products before purchase. AR and VR address this by offering personalized shopping experiences tailored to individual preferences and environments.

Sustainability-Driven Commerce

As awareness of climate change and resource depletion grows, shoppers increasingly demand products that minimize harm to the planet and promote fair labor practices. This shift requires businesses to integrate sustainability into every aspect of their operations, from product design and sourcing to packaging and distribution.

Sustainability-driven commerce emphasizes ethical sourcing practices, ensuring fair wages and safe working conditions throughout the supply chain. Brands are adopting blockchain and other technologies to increase transparency and traceability, allowing consumers to verify the origins and lifecycle of products. This transparency fosters trust and accountability, essential for maintaining brand reputation in a socially aware market.

As we navigate the rapidly changing world of commerce in 2025, adaptability and innovation have become essential for businesses aiming to thrive. Today’s consumers expect more than just products; they seek experiences that resonate with their lifestyles, values, and desire for authenticity. This evolution forces brands to reimagine their strategies and focus on creating deeper connections through meaningful engagement, transparency, and responsiveness. As 2025 unfolds, the most successful retailers will be those that master this balance, leveraging technology to connect, entertain, and inspire, while championing sustainability to build lasting trust and loyalty.