Saudi Arabia’s Global AI Hub Law: Building the Legal Backbone of AI Economy

Aug 20, 2025

Kholoud Hussein

 

Saudi Arabia is attempting something few countries have tried at national scale: using law as a market-design tool to attract sovereign-grade data, compute, and corporate R&D while giving startups a safer, faster path to build with sensitive datasets. In April 2025, policymakers published for consultation the draft “Global AI Hub Law,” a framework that proposes special legal, technical, and governance regimes for AI “hubs” physically in the Kingdom but flexible enough to interoperate with foreign rules and hyperscaler standards. If enacted close to the draft, it could change where mission-critical AI gets trained, where high-value data sits, and where founders choose to launch. 

 

At its core, the draft law imagines a ladder of AI hubs, with different protection levels depending on the sensitivity of hosted data and workloads. This isn’t just about attracting cloud capacity. It’s a diplomatic and commercial instrument that enables foreign governments and multinationals to process data in Saudi Arabia under tailored arrangements while maintaining Saudi oversight.

 

Several legal analyses note the “beyond-borders” data sovereignty concept and the ambition to create a neutral legal environment for cross-border digital commerce and dispute resolution. In other words, Riyadh is trying to become a neutral ground for global AI compute and data flows.

 

Critically, the policy is not emerging in a vacuum. Over the last five years the Kingdom created supervisory institutions (notably SDAIA) and a national AI strategy; PwC estimates AI could add about $135 billion—roughly 12–12.4% of Saudi GDP—by 2030. The government has even articulated an explicit 12% GDP target for AI’s contribution. The draft Global AI Hub Law looks like the legal scaffolding to capture that upside at home rather than offshoring it. 

 

What the Law Proposes & Why Startups Should Care

 

The consultation text outlines a regime to license and govern AI hubs that can host “sovereign” or “semi-sovereign” data centers with contractual carve-outs for foreign states or firms. The point is continuity of service, clearer allocation of liability, and predictable compliance pathways for AI training and inference at scale. For startups, three implications stand out: access, trust, and time. 

 

  • Access to premium datasets and compute: If foreign incumbents and public-sector owners are willing to warehouse sensitive data in Saudi-licensed hubs, curated data-sharing arrangements become more plausible. Startups that clear onboarding and compliance may win rights-restricted, auditable access to de-identified or synthetic derivatives of those datasets—unlocking model performance otherwise unattainable. The law’s emphasis on interoperability with external regimes could help founders sell into regulated verticals (health, finance, mobility) without re-architecting for each jurisdiction.
  • Trust by design: The proposal bakes in governance, auditability, and security expectations that many enterprise buyers demand before piloting with young companies. For venture-backed founders, that reduces sales-cycle friction. It also lowers the “compliance tax” by aligning security baselines with large buyers’ requirements, potentially letting startups piggyback on the hub’s certifications rather than building redundant controls alone. 
  • Time to market: If licensing and dispute-resolution are centralized and fast, contracting cycles shrink. Commentary around the draft law explicitly frames Saudi Arabia as a legal venue for AI-related disputes—signal to global players that enforcement will be practical. For founders, predictable dispute processes and choice-of-law clarity de-risk big-ticket partnerships.

The Capital and Infrastructure Backdrop: Why Timing Matters

 

The legal initiative dovetails with an investment super-cycle in Saudi AI infrastructure and venture capital. In 2025 the Kingdom launched HUMAIN—a state-backed AI enterprise and funder aiming to process ~7% of global AI workloads by 2030, underpinned by multi-billion-dollar compute and chip procurement plans from U.S. giants. 

 

This is not abstract: public reporting points to tens of billions in contracts and a roadmap for gigawatt-scale data centers. If that buildout proceeds, the country’s bottleneck won’t be GPUs so much as the rules and governance necessary to attract workloads that matter. That’s exactly the gap the Global AI Hub Law tries to fill.

 

On the venture side, Saudi Arabia led MENA VC in H1-2025, with roughly $860 million across 100+ deals—more than the Kingdom deployed in all of 2024—signaling both domestic and foreign appetite for Saudi tech exposure. While VC is cyclical, a legal framework that clarifies data rights, liability, and cross-border compliance could convert that financing momentum into durable product velocity for AI startups.

 

How Officials and Founders Are Framing the Moment

 

During LEAP 2025, Minister of Communications and Information Technology Abdullah Al-Swaha touted a pipeline of generative and autonomous AI applications and name-checked local companies—arguing that the Kingdom intends to be a “hub for generative AI, GenTech, and autonomous AI, powered by talent and technology.” The minister’s remarks underscore a policy mix that pairs capital with an open-for-business regulatory posture; the draft law is an institutional manifestation of that posture. 

 

Private-sector voices are leaning in. Intelmatix’s leadership, for example, has publicly connected recognition on the global stage with the company’s push to “push the frontiers of enterprise AI.” Founders in talent-tech and event-tech told local media in 2025 that Saudi’s ecosystem is creating unusual access to investors and customers; several described accelerated dealmaking and piloting cycles tied to the national tech agenda. Although these quotes aren’t about the law per se, they reflect a buyer’s market for startup solutions that a clear hub regime could amplify. 

 

From Vision 2030 to Sovereign AI

 

The Global AI Hub Law aligns with two strategic narratives. First, Vision 2030’s diversification thesis: national productivity gains and non-oil exports derived from data-intensive services. PwC’s long-running estimate—$135 billion in incremental GDP from AI by 2030—remains the headline figure used by both policymakers and investors to justify the spend. 

 

Second, the global “sovereign AI” trend: countries seeking domestic control over compute, data, and critical models. If Saudi Arabia can offer a legally neutral, operationally excellent venue for allies to compute on their data—while maintaining domestic oversight—then Riyadh becomes a node in allied AI supply chains, not just a buyer of chips. 

 

What Founders Should Do Now

 

  • Design for the hub: Startups should map draft compliance requirements to their current controls: data lineage and provenance; model documentation; bias and safety testing; and incident response. The more a product can “snap into” a hub’s governance, the faster enterprise procurement will go once the regime is live. Legal analyses suggest hubs will differentiate by data sensitivity tiers; products that support tier-appropriate controls (e.g., confidential computing; KMS segregation; privacy-preserving learning) will be advantaged. 
  • Target regulated verticals early: If the law lands close to the consultation version, AI work in fintech, health, logistics, and government services should be first to benefit. For example, remarks at LEAP referenced healthcare robotics and decision-intelligence deployments; hub licensing that clarifies cross-border data access could multiply such proofs of concept across providers and agencies. Founders building to these buyers should invest in audit-readiness and model cards now.
  • Leverage capital-infrastructure synchronicity: HUMAIN, hyperscaler partnerships, and giga-watt build-outs create new buyer surfaces: data-center operators, sovereign cloud platforms, and national-scale integrators. Those actors will need privacy tech, tooling for model evaluation, and MLOps hardened for regulated contexts. A startup that slots into these buyers’ roadmaps can ride procurement waves—especially if it can demonstrate hub-aligned compliance artifacts. 
  • Tell a compliance story investors can underwrite: VC sentiment tracks risk clarity. The MENA venture data from H1-2025 shows a return of later-stage checks; pairing product metrics with a credible plan to navigate hub rules could convert more term sheets. Investors know regulatory moats can be real moats. 

Risks, Unknowns, and the Path to Impact

 

This is still a draft. Key uncertainties include how “foreign legal regime” carve-outs will be validated and supervised; how liability is apportioned among hub operators, tenants, and application developers; and the duration and scope of any safe harbors for experimentation. There’s also the geopolitics of data localization: how will the regime interoperate with EU GDPR, U.S. sectoral rules, or Asian data-transfer constraints? Early commentary suggests the drafters anticipate these issues, but the proof will be in secondary regulations and intergovernmental MOUs. 

 

Another risk is over-reliance on physical scale—chips, megawatts, and square meters—without the human capital to operate within higher-tier hubs. Here, the government’s messaging emphasizes talent pipelines and women’s participation gains in tech (from 7% in 2018 to 35% in 2024), which, if sustained, would improve the labor supply for hub tenants and their startup suppliers. But talent competition is global, and retaining senior ML engineers is a challenge everywhere. 

 

Ultimately, capital cycles can shift, and oil revenue volatility can challenge public investment promises. Yet the Kingdom’s recent AI investment announcements and the creation of HUMAIN indicate a long-term, strategic posture. If the law can import external demand (sovereign datasets and foreign R&D) alongside domestic investment, revenue diversification improves the regime’s resilience. 

 

A Realistic Startup-Sector Outlook

 

If enacted with clear implementing rules and transparent licensing, the Global AI Hub Law would likely have three near-term effects on the Saudi startup landscape:

 

  1. Bigger, earlier enterprise pilots. Ministries, SOEs, and multinationals operating in Saudi Arabia would gain a home jurisdiction to try higher-stakes models and data combinations. That shortens pilots and expands purchase orders for local startups that can meet hub standards. Founders at 2025 events already described unusual access to investors and customers—a dynamic the hub regime should amplify. 
  2. Stronger founder narratives for export. A startup that survives procurement and compliance in a high-tier Saudi hub can market that pedigree abroad. For enterprise buyers, compliance is a proxy for reliability. Legal analysts observing the draft have underscored its novelty in reconciling sovereignty with interoperability—a positioning foreign buyers may find compelling. 
  3. Thicker middle-layer tooling markets. Expect demand for audit, evals, red-teaming, and privacy-preserving compute to surge. These aren’t sideshows; they’re the glue that makes regulated AI stackable. Local founders who specialize here can become acquisition targets for hyperscalers and sovereign cloud providers active in the Kingdom. 

Meanwhile, venture funding momentum and marquee infrastructure commitments should keep top-of-funnel opportunities flowing. Reports through mid-2025 show the Kingdom leading regional VC by dollars and deals, while the LEAP platform is still announcing multi-billion-dollar AI commitments. If the law tightens the link between that capital and compliant, data-rich workloads, the flywheel for Saudi startups could spin faster. 

 

Finally, the Global AI Hub Law is not just another digital policy. It’s an operating manual for a new kind of economic zone—one organized around data sovereignty, compute intensity, and cross-border legal interoperability. For founders, it promises clearer rules, faster enterprise access, and a shot at privileged datasets—provided they build for governance from day one. 

 

For the Kingdom, it’s the missing legal layer that could connect ambitious infrastructure plans and generous capital with the kind of high-value AI activity that actually moves GDP. If Saudi Arabia can deliver credible licensing, transparent oversight, and trusted dispute resolution, it will not merely host the AI economy—it will help define its rules. 

 

Tags

Share

Advertise here, Be the LEADER

Advertise Now

Latest Experts Thoughts

Saudi Arabia’s Global AI Hub Law: Building the Legal Backbone of AI Economy

Kholoud Hussein

 

Saudi Arabia is attempting something few countries have tried at national scale: using law as a market-design tool to attract sovereign-grade data, compute, and corporate R&D while giving startups a safer, faster path to build with sensitive datasets. In April 2025, policymakers published for consultation the draft “Global AI Hub Law,” a framework that proposes special legal, technical, and governance regimes for AI “hubs” physically in the Kingdom but flexible enough to interoperate with foreign rules and hyperscaler standards. If enacted close to the draft, it could change where mission-critical AI gets trained, where high-value data sits, and where founders choose to launch. 

 

At its core, the draft law imagines a ladder of AI hubs, with different protection levels depending on the sensitivity of hosted data and workloads. This isn’t just about attracting cloud capacity. It’s a diplomatic and commercial instrument that enables foreign governments and multinationals to process data in Saudi Arabia under tailored arrangements while maintaining Saudi oversight.

 

Several legal analyses note the “beyond-borders” data sovereignty concept and the ambition to create a neutral legal environment for cross-border digital commerce and dispute resolution. In other words, Riyadh is trying to become a neutral ground for global AI compute and data flows.

 

Critically, the policy is not emerging in a vacuum. Over the last five years the Kingdom created supervisory institutions (notably SDAIA) and a national AI strategy; PwC estimates AI could add about $135 billion—roughly 12–12.4% of Saudi GDP—by 2030. The government has even articulated an explicit 12% GDP target for AI’s contribution. The draft Global AI Hub Law looks like the legal scaffolding to capture that upside at home rather than offshoring it. 

 

What the Law Proposes & Why Startups Should Care

 

The consultation text outlines a regime to license and govern AI hubs that can host “sovereign” or “semi-sovereign” data centers with contractual carve-outs for foreign states or firms. The point is continuity of service, clearer allocation of liability, and predictable compliance pathways for AI training and inference at scale. For startups, three implications stand out: access, trust, and time. 

 

  • Access to premium datasets and compute: If foreign incumbents and public-sector owners are willing to warehouse sensitive data in Saudi-licensed hubs, curated data-sharing arrangements become more plausible. Startups that clear onboarding and compliance may win rights-restricted, auditable access to de-identified or synthetic derivatives of those datasets—unlocking model performance otherwise unattainable. The law’s emphasis on interoperability with external regimes could help founders sell into regulated verticals (health, finance, mobility) without re-architecting for each jurisdiction.
  • Trust by design: The proposal bakes in governance, auditability, and security expectations that many enterprise buyers demand before piloting with young companies. For venture-backed founders, that reduces sales-cycle friction. It also lowers the “compliance tax” by aligning security baselines with large buyers’ requirements, potentially letting startups piggyback on the hub’s certifications rather than building redundant controls alone. 
  • Time to market: If licensing and dispute-resolution are centralized and fast, contracting cycles shrink. Commentary around the draft law explicitly frames Saudi Arabia as a legal venue for AI-related disputes—signal to global players that enforcement will be practical. For founders, predictable dispute processes and choice-of-law clarity de-risk big-ticket partnerships.

The Capital and Infrastructure Backdrop: Why Timing Matters

 

The legal initiative dovetails with an investment super-cycle in Saudi AI infrastructure and venture capital. In 2025 the Kingdom launched HUMAIN—a state-backed AI enterprise and funder aiming to process ~7% of global AI workloads by 2030, underpinned by multi-billion-dollar compute and chip procurement plans from U.S. giants. 

 

This is not abstract: public reporting points to tens of billions in contracts and a roadmap for gigawatt-scale data centers. If that buildout proceeds, the country’s bottleneck won’t be GPUs so much as the rules and governance necessary to attract workloads that matter. That’s exactly the gap the Global AI Hub Law tries to fill.

 

On the venture side, Saudi Arabia led MENA VC in H1-2025, with roughly $860 million across 100+ deals—more than the Kingdom deployed in all of 2024—signaling both domestic and foreign appetite for Saudi tech exposure. While VC is cyclical, a legal framework that clarifies data rights, liability, and cross-border compliance could convert that financing momentum into durable product velocity for AI startups.

 

How Officials and Founders Are Framing the Moment

 

During LEAP 2025, Minister of Communications and Information Technology Abdullah Al-Swaha touted a pipeline of generative and autonomous AI applications and name-checked local companies—arguing that the Kingdom intends to be a “hub for generative AI, GenTech, and autonomous AI, powered by talent and technology.” The minister’s remarks underscore a policy mix that pairs capital with an open-for-business regulatory posture; the draft law is an institutional manifestation of that posture. 

 

Private-sector voices are leaning in. Intelmatix’s leadership, for example, has publicly connected recognition on the global stage with the company’s push to “push the frontiers of enterprise AI.” Founders in talent-tech and event-tech told local media in 2025 that Saudi’s ecosystem is creating unusual access to investors and customers; several described accelerated dealmaking and piloting cycles tied to the national tech agenda. Although these quotes aren’t about the law per se, they reflect a buyer’s market for startup solutions that a clear hub regime could amplify. 

 

From Vision 2030 to Sovereign AI

 

The Global AI Hub Law aligns with two strategic narratives. First, Vision 2030’s diversification thesis: national productivity gains and non-oil exports derived from data-intensive services. PwC’s long-running estimate—$135 billion in incremental GDP from AI by 2030—remains the headline figure used by both policymakers and investors to justify the spend. 

 

Second, the global “sovereign AI” trend: countries seeking domestic control over compute, data, and critical models. If Saudi Arabia can offer a legally neutral, operationally excellent venue for allies to compute on their data—while maintaining domestic oversight—then Riyadh becomes a node in allied AI supply chains, not just a buyer of chips. 

 

What Founders Should Do Now

 

  • Design for the hub: Startups should map draft compliance requirements to their current controls: data lineage and provenance; model documentation; bias and safety testing; and incident response. The more a product can “snap into” a hub’s governance, the faster enterprise procurement will go once the regime is live. Legal analyses suggest hubs will differentiate by data sensitivity tiers; products that support tier-appropriate controls (e.g., confidential computing; KMS segregation; privacy-preserving learning) will be advantaged. 
  • Target regulated verticals early: If the law lands close to the consultation version, AI work in fintech, health, logistics, and government services should be first to benefit. For example, remarks at LEAP referenced healthcare robotics and decision-intelligence deployments; hub licensing that clarifies cross-border data access could multiply such proofs of concept across providers and agencies. Founders building to these buyers should invest in audit-readiness and model cards now.
  • Leverage capital-infrastructure synchronicity: HUMAIN, hyperscaler partnerships, and giga-watt build-outs create new buyer surfaces: data-center operators, sovereign cloud platforms, and national-scale integrators. Those actors will need privacy tech, tooling for model evaluation, and MLOps hardened for regulated contexts. A startup that slots into these buyers’ roadmaps can ride procurement waves—especially if it can demonstrate hub-aligned compliance artifacts. 
  • Tell a compliance story investors can underwrite: VC sentiment tracks risk clarity. The MENA venture data from H1-2025 shows a return of later-stage checks; pairing product metrics with a credible plan to navigate hub rules could convert more term sheets. Investors know regulatory moats can be real moats. 

Risks, Unknowns, and the Path to Impact

 

This is still a draft. Key uncertainties include how “foreign legal regime” carve-outs will be validated and supervised; how liability is apportioned among hub operators, tenants, and application developers; and the duration and scope of any safe harbors for experimentation. There’s also the geopolitics of data localization: how will the regime interoperate with EU GDPR, U.S. sectoral rules, or Asian data-transfer constraints? Early commentary suggests the drafters anticipate these issues, but the proof will be in secondary regulations and intergovernmental MOUs. 

 

Another risk is over-reliance on physical scale—chips, megawatts, and square meters—without the human capital to operate within higher-tier hubs. Here, the government’s messaging emphasizes talent pipelines and women’s participation gains in tech (from 7% in 2018 to 35% in 2024), which, if sustained, would improve the labor supply for hub tenants and their startup suppliers. But talent competition is global, and retaining senior ML engineers is a challenge everywhere. 

 

Ultimately, capital cycles can shift, and oil revenue volatility can challenge public investment promises. Yet the Kingdom’s recent AI investment announcements and the creation of HUMAIN indicate a long-term, strategic posture. If the law can import external demand (sovereign datasets and foreign R&D) alongside domestic investment, revenue diversification improves the regime’s resilience. 

 

A Realistic Startup-Sector Outlook

 

If enacted with clear implementing rules and transparent licensing, the Global AI Hub Law would likely have three near-term effects on the Saudi startup landscape:

 

  1. Bigger, earlier enterprise pilots. Ministries, SOEs, and multinationals operating in Saudi Arabia would gain a home jurisdiction to try higher-stakes models and data combinations. That shortens pilots and expands purchase orders for local startups that can meet hub standards. Founders at 2025 events already described unusual access to investors and customers—a dynamic the hub regime should amplify. 
  2. Stronger founder narratives for export. A startup that survives procurement and compliance in a high-tier Saudi hub can market that pedigree abroad. For enterprise buyers, compliance is a proxy for reliability. Legal analysts observing the draft have underscored its novelty in reconciling sovereignty with interoperability—a positioning foreign buyers may find compelling. 
  3. Thicker middle-layer tooling markets. Expect demand for audit, evals, red-teaming, and privacy-preserving compute to surge. These aren’t sideshows; they’re the glue that makes regulated AI stackable. Local founders who specialize here can become acquisition targets for hyperscalers and sovereign cloud providers active in the Kingdom. 

Meanwhile, venture funding momentum and marquee infrastructure commitments should keep top-of-funnel opportunities flowing. Reports through mid-2025 show the Kingdom leading regional VC by dollars and deals, while the LEAP platform is still announcing multi-billion-dollar AI commitments. If the law tightens the link between that capital and compliant, data-rich workloads, the flywheel for Saudi startups could spin faster. 

 

Finally, the Global AI Hub Law is not just another digital policy. It’s an operating manual for a new kind of economic zone—one organized around data sovereignty, compute intensity, and cross-border legal interoperability. For founders, it promises clearer rules, faster enterprise access, and a shot at privileged datasets—provided they build for governance from day one. 

 

For the Kingdom, it’s the missing legal layer that could connect ambitious infrastructure plans and generous capital with the kind of high-value AI activity that actually moves GDP. If Saudi Arabia can deliver credible licensing, transparent oversight, and trusted dispute resolution, it will not merely host the AI economy—it will help define its rules. 

 

Bridge Round vs Extension Round: What Startups in MENA Need to Know

Ghada Ismail

 

In the startup scene, raising money is rarely a straight line. Founders often find themselves between major funding milestones, needing extra capital to keep moving forward. This is where two financing tools come in: the bridge round and the extension round. While they sound similar, each serves a distinct purpose and is applied differently depending on the company’s stage and needs.

 

What is a Bridge Round?

A bridge round is exactly what it sounds like: a bridge. It’s temporary funding that helps a startup “cross over” to its next big milestone. For example, a startup might raise a bridge round to extend its runway until it can close a larger Series A or Series B.

These rounds often come from existing investors, who already believe in the company and want to protect their earlier investment. Sometimes, bridge rounds are structured as convertible notes or SAFE agreements, which postpone the valuation discussion until the next major funding event.

 

In the MENA region, several startups have turned to bridge rounds. A notable example is Kashat, the Cairo-based fintech offering nano-loans to Egypt’s unbanked population. In 2021, the startup raised $1.75 million in bridge financing, providing the short-term capital it needed to further develop its platform and expand operations before securing larger rounds. This illustrates how bridge funding can give startups in emerging markets the breathing space to strengthen their fundamentals while preparing for the next stage of growth.

 

What is an Extension Round?

An extension round, by contrast, is not about survival; it’s rather about momentum. In this case, a company has already raised a round, say a Series A, but wants to bring in more capital under the same terms. Instead of rushing into a higher-priced Series B, the startup simply extends its existing round, allowing new or existing investors to participate without changing the valuation.

Extensions are particularly useful when the company is performing well and sees fresh opportunities, but the timing isn’t right for a new fundraising milestone. 

 

For example, UAE-based cloud kitchen giant Kitopi reportedly tapped into extension rounds in its growth phase, bringing in extra firepower from new investors while keeping its valuation steady until it was ready for a much larger jump. In mid-2021, Kitopi closed a $415 million Series C funding round, led by SoftBank Vision Fund 2 with participation from other investors. Later that year—or into early 2022—the company raised an additional $300 million as a Series C extension, bringing the total size of the funding round to approximately $715 million and lifting its valuation to about $1.55 billion.

 

How Founders Decide Between the Two

So how does a founder know which path makes more sense—bridge or extension? It often comes down to intent.

  • If the company is under pressure—perhaps revenue growth slowed, or the market turned tough—a bridge round provides short-term relief until conditions improve.
  • If the company is doing well but wants to capitalize on opportunities before the next major raise, an extension round allows for flexibility without the burden of a new valuation.

Both tools have risks. A bridge round can signal distress if not managed carefully, while an extension round could dilute founders more than they’d like. Yet, when used strategically, both can be powerful instruments to keep momentum alive.

 

Why It Matters in MENA

The startup ecosystem in the Middle East and North Africa is still maturing. Many companies operate in fast-changing regulatory environments and fragmented markets. That means fundraising is not always as predictable as in Silicon Valley.

Bridge and extension rounds offer founders flexibility in navigating this landscape. They buy time, bring in the right investors, and allow companies to align growth with the realities of local markets. As more MENA startups scale beyond their home countries, we’re likely to see these tools used more frequently.

 

Wrapping Things Up…

For founders in Saudi Arabia and the broader region, the lesson is clear: not every funding story has to fit neatly into the Seed–Series A–Series B path. Sometimes, it’s about building the right bridge or extending what’s already working.

Investors, too, are becoming more open to these structures as they realize the unique challenges startups face in this region. Whether it’s a Saudi fintech waiting on central bank licensing or an Egyptian logistics startup expanding to Africa, bridge and extension rounds are proving to be valuable stopgaps that help startups stay on track.

In the end, the key is transparency. Founders should communicate clearly why they’re raising a bridge or extension, what the money will achieve, and how it sets the stage for the next big leap. Done right, these rounds are not a detour; they’re part of the journey.

 

How dropshipping fuels entrepreneurial growth in Saudi e-commerce sector

Noha Gad 

 

The e-commerce sector in Saudi Arabia has witnessed rapid and transformative growth over the past years, backed by government policies and reforms, rising internet penetration, and the increasing demand for online shopping and electronic payments. According to recent figures by the Small and Medium Enterprises General Authority (Monsha’at), the total number of active e-commerce registrations recorded 41,322 by the end of the first quarter (Q1) of 2025, marking a 6% year-on-year (YoY) increase.

The e-commerce sector emerged as a key pillar of the Saudi Vision 2030’s goals of enhancing the national economy and reinforcing the Kingdom’s position among the world’s top 10 countries leading e-commerce growth. The total number of existing e-commerce registrations surpassed 39,300 in Q2-15, according to the latest report released by the Ministry of Commerce.

The e-commerce market in Saudi Arabia is projected to reach $24.1 billion in 2029, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 9.91% during the period from 2025 to 2029, according to Statista, the global data and business intelligence platform. Another report published on the Research and Markets platform, the world’s largest market research store, expected this promising sector to hit $689 billion by the end of 2033, with a CAGR of 12.1% from 2025-2033.

As consumers are shifting towards online shopping due to convenience and competitive pricing, dropshipping has emerged as a cost-effective and scalable business model that enables businesses, notably small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), to enter the market.

 

What is dropshipping?

Dropshipping, or direct shipping, is a fulfillment model that allows entrepreneurs and e-commerce businesses to outsource the processes of procuring, storing, and shipping products to a third party, typically a supplier. This fulfillment model commonly appeals to entrepreneurs seeking efficiency and low overhead. It enables the retailer to forward the order details to a third-party supplier, such as a manufacturer, wholesaler, or distributor, who then handles the packaging and ships the product directly to the customer. This means that the retailer acts as a middleman, selling products without ever physically handling them.

Traditionally, retailers need to buy products in bulk, store them, and take care of shipping logistics, which requires significant capital and operational resources. Dropshipping removes these barriers by allowing online sellers to focus primarily on marketing and customer service while the supplier manages fulfillment.

 

How to start your dropshipping business in Saudi Arabia?

The very first step to start your dropshipping business is to choose the products you want to sell in your online store. You can select products from a supplier or a manufacturer, based on your niche and target audience.

Company formation and commercial registrations. In this step, you have to obtain your commercial registration (CR) and select the correct legal structure, whether it is a sole proprietorship, LLC, or an establishment. You must also register your business with the Zakat, Tax, and Customs Authority (ZATCA) for VAT compliance. 

To set up your online store or platform, you have to conduct a comprehensive feasibility study and market research to assess demand trends for your product niches in the Saudi market, competition benchmarks and pricing analysis, customer segmentation and social media targeting, fulfillment timelines, and supplier reliability, in addition to profitability projections under different growth scenarios.

After obtaining all required documents and finishing the market research, you have to find a reliable supplier to get quality products at competitive prices. Now, you can list products on your online store, using product descriptions and images provided by the supplier to create product listings. You will need to integrate local payment gateways, such as SDAD, Mada, and other popular payment solutions in Saudi Arabia, into your platform 

 

Pros and Cons of a dropshipping business

 

The dropshipping business model offers various benefits for entrepreneurs, notably:

  • Overhead costs: You do not need a huge capital to start. Dropshipping has the potential to lower overhead costs, including maintaining a storage facility or sending products to customers. 
  • Starting costs: Entrepreneurs looking to start a business with minimal investment choose dropshipping as they do not need to invest in facilities or resources to process orders.
  • Reduced risks: dropshipping offers less risk of losing money due to lost merchandise or over-ordering products since the stock is kept at the suppliers’ warehouse.
  • Operating location: You can fulfill orders regardless of your operating location, opening up a possibility to work from anywhere.
  • Product variety: Dropshipping enables you to sell a broad range of items and increase your earning potential.
  • Flexibility and scalability: this business model allows you to test different goods to see what sells best, without worrying about losing your investment. It also enables you to accept more orders without increasing the inventory you store, package, and ship.

Although the dropshipping model provides various benefits, it comes with several disadvantages, including:

  • Limited control over product quality, which may lead to poor customer satisfaction.
  • High competition and market saturation make it difficult to maintain profit margins.
  • Heavy reliance on suppliers for inventory availability, fulfillment, and accuracy.
  • Challenges in managing returns and refunds, especially with multiple or international suppliers

With key players such as Salla, Zid, and Dukakeen, the dropshipping business model can boost the e-commerce industry in Saudi Arabia through multiple mechanisms. This includes reducing entry barriers for entrepreneurs, increasing product variety, and supporting scalability, capitalizing on the Kingdom’s massive investment in digital infrastructure and entrepreneurship.

 

Finally, the emergence of the dropshipping model further highlights the flexibility and inclusiveness of the Saudi e-commerce sector. By enabling businesses of all sizes to reach customers efficiently, it helps diversify product offerings and accelerates market entry, reinforcing the Kingdom’s role as a leader in e-commerce transformation. Although this model presents operational challenges, its capacity to foster entrepreneurship and lower barriers makes it integral to Saudi Arabia’s ambitious plans for development and digital progress.

Looking ahead, continued advancement in payment infrastructure, logistics, and technology will only serve to strengthen the Kingdom’s competitive edge in global e-commerce.

The API Economy: How Digital Connections Are Powering the Next Wave of Business

Kholoud Hussein 

 

Not so long ago, businesses operated as mostly self-contained entities. Their systems, data, and processes existed in silos, rarely shared with outsiders. In today’s digital-first economy, that model looks increasingly outdated. The companies thriving today are those that not only build great products but also connect seamlessly with others through APIs.

 

Welcome to the API Economy — a new business paradigm where application programming interfaces (APIs) are not just technical tools but economic enablers, opening new revenue streams, fueling innovation, and reshaping entire industries.

 

Much like how Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) revolutionized how businesses consume software, the API Economy is transforming how companies interact, partner, and scale in the digital marketplace.

 

What is the API Economy?

At its simplest, an API is a digital bridge: a standardized way for two applications to communicate and exchange data. The API Economy refers to the commercial ecosystem that emerges when businesses expose or consume APIs to create value.

 

Think of APIs as building blocks. They allow companies to integrate payment systems, logistics services, weather data, social media feeds, or even AI models into their platforms without reinventing the wheel.

 

For example:

  • A travel startup can integrate flight data and hotel booking APIs.
  • A fintech app can connect instantly to payment gateways or identity verification services.
  • An e-commerce platform can plug into logistics and delivery APIs to streamline operations.

These connections are not just technical conveniences; they’re now core to competitive strategy.

 

Why the API Economy Matters for Startups

For startups, APIs represent both an opportunity and a survival strategy.

 

1. Faster Innovation
Instead of building everything in-house, startups can use APIs to stitch together best-in-class services. This accelerates time-to-market and lets them focus on what truly differentiates their product.

2. Lower Costs
APIs eliminate the need for expensive infrastructure or proprietary solutions. A small team can launch a global app by tapping into APIs for payments, messaging, and analytics.

3. Ecosystem Leverage
Startups can integrate directly into the ecosystems of larger players. For instance, by connecting to Stripe or PayPal APIs, a startup immediately plugs into global payment networks.

4. New Revenue Streams
It’s not just about using APIs — startups can also offer APIs. By opening up their own services to third-party developers, startups can create entire ecosystems around their platforms, generating revenue and adoption simultaneously.

 

Examples of API-Led Transformation

  • Fintech: APIs enable real-time banking, mobile wallets, and open banking models.
  • E-commerce: APIs power recommendation engines, shipping integrations, and inventory syncing.
  • Healthtech: Secure APIs allow hospitals and apps to exchange patient data in compliance with regulations.
  • Social Media: Entire businesses are built on APIs that allow integration with Facebook, Instagram, or TikTok.

In each case, the API is not just a technical connector — it’s the business enabler that makes new models possible.

 

Challenges in the API Economy

Like any new paradigm, the API Economy brings risks and trade-offs:

 

  • Security Risks: Poorly secured APIs can expose businesses to cyberattacks and data leaks.
  • Dependency: Overreliance on third-party APIs can create vulnerabilities if providers change pricing, terms, or shut down services.
  • Quality & Reliability: The success of a product may hinge on the stability of APIs outside the startup’s control.

Startups need clear strategies for API selection, vendor diversification, and data governance to mitigate these risks.

 

The Bigger Picture

The API Economy is more than a technical trend; it’s becoming the infrastructure of digital business. Just as electricity grids powered the industrial economy, APIs now power the digital one — invisible, essential, and everywhere.

 

For startups, the lesson is straightforward: agility and growth increasingly depend on how well you can connect, integrate, and collaborate through APIs. Those who master the API Economy are not just faster to market — they are better positioned to scale globally, innovate continuously, and embed themselves into the networks of the future.

 

In short, APIs are currency in the digital economy.

 

 

AI-as-a-Service: Making Artificial Intelligence Accessible for Every Startup

Kholoud Hussein 

 

For much of its history, artificial intelligence was an elite technology — the preserve of deep-pocketed corporations and advanced research labs. Building an AI model from the ground up required vast datasets, specialized hardware, and teams of highly skilled engineers and data scientists. For a startup working with tight budgets and even tighter timelines, AI was often an unattainable dream.

 

That landscape is changing fast. AI-as-a-Service (AIaaS) is rewriting the rules, allowing companies to rent advanced AI capabilities from cloud-based platforms, much as they would subscribe to software through Software-as-a-Service (SaaS). Instead of spending months — or years — developing proprietary systems, startups can plug directly into pre-trained models, scale them on demand, and pay only for the computing power and services they use.

 

This shift is democratizing access to one of the most transformative technologies of our time — and giving young companies a fighting chance to compete with established industry giants.

 

What is AI-as-a-Service?

At its core, AIaaS is the delivery of artificial intelligence functions via the cloud, on a subscription or pay-per-use basis. The services can include:

 

  • Machine Learning Platforms for training predictive models.
  • Computer Vision APIs for object detection, image recognition, and video analytics.
  • Natural Language Processing (NLP) for chatbots, sentiment analysis, and language translation.
  • Generative AI Tools that produce text, images, audio, or code based on user prompts.

These capabilities are offered by major cloud providers, such as Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud, as well as by specialized AI companies targeting niche needs.

 

For startups, the appeal is clear: instead of investing heavily in infrastructure and talent, they can integrate AI through a few lines of code and focus their limited resources on innovation, customer acquisition, and scaling.

 

Why AIaaS Matters for Startups

Startups thrive on speed, adaptability, and the ability to outperform their competitors. AIaaS directly supports these priorities in several ways:

 

1. Lower Barriers to Entry
Traditional AI development demands substantial capital, technical expertise, and time. AIaaS reduces these barriers by providing ready-made solutions that even non-technical teams can integrate into their products.

2. Faster Time-to-Market
A startup building a voice recognition feature or a fraud detection system can implement AIaaS in weeks rather than months or years, enabling them to launch features rapidly and iterate based on user feedback.

3. Scalability
AIaaS operates on flexible, cloud-based infrastructure. As a startup grows, it can scale AI usage up or down depending on demand, without worrying about costly hardware upgrades.

4. Continuous Improvement
Providers regularly update their AI models with the latest advancements, giving startups access to cutting-edge capabilities without ongoing research and development costs.

 

Strategic Considerations

While AIaaS offers clear advantages, startups need to approach it strategically:

 

  • Data Privacy: Sensitive customer data must be handled in compliance with regulations, especially when processed through third-party services.
  • Vendor Lock-In: Building products heavily dependent on a single provider’s ecosystem can make future transitions expensive and risky.
  • Customization Limits: Off-the-shelf AI solutions may not fully address highly specific or complex problems.

Balancing the convenience of AIaaS with the need for long-term flexibility is essential to avoid costly pivots later.

 

The Bigger Picture

AIaaS is part of a broader trend toward the “as-a-service” economy, where complex capabilities are delivered via subscription rather than ownership. Just as SaaS made enterprise-grade software accessible to startups, AIaaS is making advanced AI tools available to companies at any stage of growth.

 

For early-stage ventures, this levels the playing field, enabling them to innovate at the same technological pace as far larger competitors. For more mature startups, it can accelerate entry into new markets and support rapid product diversification.

 

The underlying truth is simple: AI is becoming as essential to modern business as the internet was two decades ago. With AIaaS, the question is no longer whether a startup can afford to use artificial intelligence — but whether it can afford not to.